§Practice Areas

Five lines of institutional practice.

The firm focuses exclusively on advisory work in international trade and structured finance. We do not act as principal, do not take positions and do not distribute paper. Independence is the product.

  • I.

    Documentary Trade Finance

    Advisory support for letters of credit, standby instruments and bank guarantees used in cross-border industrial and capital-goods trade.

    Engage on this practice →

    Mandate scope

    • ·Sight, deferred-payment and acceptance L/Cs (MT-700 family)
    • ·Standby letters of credit under ISP 98
    • ·Demand guarantees under URDG 758 — bid, performance, advance-payment, warranty
    • ·Confirming-bank selection and risk participation
  • II.

    Structured & Receivables Finance

    Bespoke receivables programmes, supplier finance facilities and risk-mitigated structured credit for corporates seeking off-balance-sheet liquidity at institutional pricing.

    Engage on this practice →

    Mandate scope

    • ·True-sale and synthetic receivables programmes
    • ·Supplier finance and dynamic discounting facilities
    • ·Borrowing-base lending for commodity and inventory exposures
    • ·Insurance-wrapped trade credit structures
  • III.

    Project & ECA-Backed Finance

    Advisory on long-tenor facilities with export-credit-agency cover, multilateral guarantees and DFI participation for capital-intensive cross-border projects.

    Engage on this practice →

    Mandate scope

    • ·Buyer-credit and supplier-credit structuring under OECD Arrangement
    • ·ECA pricing, premium and tied-aid analysis
    • ·Multilateral and DFI co-financing
    • ·Construction-phase to take-out conversion strategies
  • IV.

    Counterparty & Country Risk

    Independent assessment of issuing-bank credit, jurisdiction risk and sanctions exposure — delivered as a written opinion before any instrument is executed.

    Engage on this practice →

    Mandate scope

    • ·Issuing- and confirming-bank credit assessment
    • ·Sovereign and sub-sovereign jurisdiction review
    • ·Sanctions and OFAC / UK-OFSI / EU exposure screening
    • ·Documentary clause-by-clause risk audit
  • V.

    Document Review & Transaction Supervision

    Compliance review of transaction documents, verification of financial instruments and supervision of the transaction process — to assist principals in identifying potential red flags, inconsistencies and procedural weaknesses before submission to banks or counterparties.

    Engage on this practice →

    Mandate scope

    • ·Compliance review of transaction documents and supporting papers
    • ·Review of SBLC, LC, BG and RWA documentation
    • ·Review of MT-700, MT-760 and MT-799 message wording
    • ·Identification of inconsistencies, red flags and documentary discrepancies
    • ·Review against ICC standards — UCP 600, ISP 98, URDG 758 where applicable
    • ·Counterparty and document-level due diligence support
    • ·Coordination with banks, legal counsel and compliance teams
    • ·Written observations, document review notes and risk comments
VII.Engagement principles

Conditions that govern every mandate.

Confidentiality

Engagement terms can include appropriate confidentiality provisions. Information is handled within the agreed scope and shared only with authorised parties.

Written scope

Every engagement begins with a signed terms-of-reference setting out perimeter, deliverables, governing rules and fee basis. No work commences before scope is agreed.

Fee basis

Typically retainer-and-success or fixed scope. Aligned to deliverables, disclosed in writing and free of distribution or referral incentives.

Jurisdictional reach

Cross-border mandates may involve coordination with local counsel, tax advisers, banks and compliance teams where required.

Documentary standard

Documents may be reviewed against ICC rules — UCP 600, ISP98 and URDG758 — where applicable, alongside relevant compliance procedures.

Direct accountability

Corporate and mandate enquiries have an identified primary contact, and responsibility is documented in the engagement scope.

VI.Methodology

A four-stage execution process.

Every Aurus mandate is methodical, written and conducted under an agreed scope from initial review through the defined deliverables.

01Stage

Mandate scoping

Engagement begins with a written terms-of-reference. We define the transaction perimeter, the institutional counterparties to be approached, and the deliverables — before any market sounding.

02Stage

Counterparty selection

Issuer selection is independent and reasoned. Choices are documented against jurisdiction, currency, tenor, sanctions framework and the credit standing of every party in the chain.

03Stage

Negotiation & documentation

Instrument wording is drafted, negotiated with the beneficiary's bank and finalised under UCP, ISP or URDG as appropriate. Nothing transmits over SWIFT until every clause is settled.

04Stage

Execution support & supervision

The firm coordinates the agreed advisory process through document presentation, amendment and settlement stages, without guaranteeing acceptance or outcome.

To discuss whether a prospective transaction is suited to the firm's practice, the firm is available for a confidential introductory call.

Request a confidential consultation →